Very few things in an Anno game would function without roads: they connect all the player’s buildings on an island, starting at the harbour and connecting lonely woodcutters, houses in the towns and every other little production outpost.

They enable the transportation of goods and visualize the delivery time and distance of said goods via transportation feedback units with carts or wagons. They play a key role in the city planning for players and help organize the different parts of an island.

And, lastly, all kinds of other feedback units (i.e. pedestrians, animals, etc.) spawn on them as well and make the world look livelier and more believable.

Importantly: They are sticking to the grid like everything else in the game. But… what if we expanded your options in the grid for Anno 117: Pax Romana?

In our two-part series on the Anno grid and roads, we first give you an overview of what changed and what that means for your gameplay experience. In the second blog we’ll dive deeper into the “how” and “why”, the technical details and challenges we faced in making this happen.

Roads in Anno 117: Pax Romana

To be perfectly honest with you, this was not the first time we thought about breaking up the usual 90° angle grid for Anno. Each time we ran into issues, felt that the solution would not quite live up to what we thought was important to Anno and/or decided that our time was better spent on other features, adding more value to the game and for our players. After all, one does not simply rework the Anno grid system.

Until now!

In Anno 117: Pax Romana the grid is reworked with additional functionality to allow for 45° angles of roads and buildings. This does help making both streets and anything connected to them look significantly more organic, and can certainly change up the look and feel of both building your cities and setting up your production chains.

We have also put work in making corners and street connections look smoother, creating automatically smooth curves instead of sharp corners. The streets also automatically adjust and straighten when buildings are placed near them (e.g. when players place a house directly in the corner in order to waste as little space as possible space) for a more appealing look.

As Anno 1800 veterans, you can otherwise expect similar behaviour as you’re used to: roads are adjusting to the terrain elevation, they’re creating bridges when you draw them over a river and change to a pier-style version when built on the coast. You can also expect different road types, with better versions costing more but providing some benefits.

A look under the hood

That was a VERY quick overview but how are roads working now, from a design point of view? Let’s get into the technical details with the support from Nicolas from Game Design, Christian and Johannes from Gameplay Programming, Tim from 3D Programming and David from Art.

The grid in Anno 117: Pax Romana is made of single tiles which are further divided into 4 sub-tiles, while Anno 1800 only had single tiles. This was a necessary change to allow for diagonal building, since we can now make any objects you place also correctly fit into the grid diagonally, see below:

Isn’t this now just much better looking than the zigzag from before? See below for a direct comparison when building a road from A to B:

Another change to support both diagonal roads and the improved visuals in terms of smooth curves: streets are now graphs, instead of being rendered tile by tile. This essentially allows us to render the entire section from one node to the next (see image below) which does make it look more coherent and takes any intersections into consideration.

One downside of this change is that it’s not possible anymore to build a road that covers exactly one grid tile. A road will always have to be at least two grid tiles long.

As a result of these changes and the increased number of ways roads can intersect, we couldn’t use the same way we handled road tiles on Art and rendering side in Anno 1800 where each possibility had its own complete version created by the Art team. Back then, we worked with sets of road tiles like this:

In 45° the number of possible intersections is drastically increased. Calculating that number is actually not trivial, because street intersections are not limited to one tile so they can overlap with other intersections creating something that can lovingly be described as a huge mess.

You remember the sub-tiles of each main tile? Based on them, we decided that Art would create a smaller subset of pieces which then would be assigned to the correct position (according to context) to form roads based on the code created by the 3D Programming team.

That doesn’t mean that this process is easy – this picture shows quite nicely what’s possible when building multiple pieces, curves and intersections close together – and all of that has to work and look pretty:

Building smoothly

Important for us was that players can switch between the “good old” 4 directions that served the Anno series so well over the last 25 years or all 8 directions we offer you now on the fly: you can enable and disable the option at any time.

This also meant that intuitiveness played an important role when we designed the update to the grid and road system: Despite these new options, our focus was to still make building roads as straightforward and simple as before, where a few clicks connect two points on the island no matter how they are orientated in the grid.

Accordingly, all buildings also automatically align themselves to the placed roads next to them, no matter if they are built in 45° or 90°. You can still manually rotate them to your liking, of course

On that note we’re sure you’ll appreciate another quality-of-life feature that made its way into Anno 117: Pax Romana from Anno 1800’s console version. Hovering with a road in build mode over any building allows you to build a road that surrounds the whole building with just a single click. This way you can quickly have a block of residences surrounded by a road – or a warehouse, like in the example below. Have a look!

And finally, the important question: How does the team prefer to build their cities in Anno 117: Pax Romana? And which approach would they recommend players as default option – using all 8 directions or only the “traditional” 4?

Nicolas: “I personally like having different neighbourhoods (different cluster of residences, production) and each one can have different orientation.

I also like to orientate element based on the shape of mountains, coasts and rivers. It creates very dense and optimal clusters and still feel very organic.

One of my favourite aspects is have farm field with various shape. Bye-bye angular farm fields!”

Johannes: “I usually play in a manner, where I want to reach my next goal as efficiently as possible – and for me that works best when fully sticking to a 90° angle.

However, it’s a totally different thing when playing multiplayer. My focus then switches away from building efficiently towards building more interestingly looking districts. This takes more time and space but also feels rewarding when I can delight / surprise my multiplayer-partner with the more organic look.”

Outro

As you see: While Anno 117: Pax Romana stays true to the grid (that has become central to the series and makes everyone happy who loves building as efficiently as possible) we did introduce more flexibility on top of what you’re used to. Those came with their own set of challenges during design and development but also new opportunities to change up the visual style of your cities and islands, more freedom to build your islands the way you want. Despite the added complexity through the diagonal option, building roads in this expanded grid feels as intuitive as before.

Other features in the game use a similar functionality to the roads… more on that later. Completely unrelated: Did you know that the historical Romans built a ton of aqueducts?

We did mention “challenges” a few times throughout this blog, as well as implications for other parts of the game – more on this in the second part of this DevBlog in the coming weeks.

So, for today: We hope you got a good first idea of what to expect in Anno 117: Pax Romana. If you have any questions on the grid or the topic of roads, don’t hesitate to share them with us!

Hey Anno Community,

Not too long ago we’ve released a DevBlog on the first months of our work on Anno 117: Pax Romana, how we tackled starting a new Anno project and creating the vision. If you missed it, you can find the blog here.

But how are things looking like on Anno 117: Pax Romana right now, development-wise?

While – as communicated before – you will have to be a little bit more patient until we show you our “baby” in action, we nevertheless want to give you an update on the current state of the development today.

What happened in the last months

Over the last months, we have made very good progress on the game and recently reached an important milestone which, of course, demanded to be properly celebrated with cake.

Having implemented the vast majority of features, with more content being added each milestone, we wanted to put the game in the hands of players once again and organised our largest playtest yet (a one-week diary study) in September.

We very much appreciated the input from all participants who – in this very much still in-progress version with certainly not final balancing – provided us valuable insights into topics like the progression, various UI elements (e.g. trade route setup or the location of the game speed options) and the age-old question of island size.

So, what are some of the most recent additions and improvements for Anno 117: Pax Romana?

• We have made large steps in regard to the islands and terrain, having recently overhauled many of the island designs as well as trees and rock textures and – going by the feedback from the last internal presentation – reached “I want to go there on vacation” territory.
• Since a few months, there now also are work-in-progress versions of NPCs and the diplomacy system to deal with – no more “I can grab any island I want” situations in the playtests. Time to build more Triremes and protect those trade routes!
• The life of your citizens has always been an important aspect of Anno, and Anno 117: Pax Romana is no different. Reason enough for our animator to add a completely new set of feedback units (people and animals) to the game. Plus, we went and did some motion-capture! More on this in a future DevBlog.
• We’ve also made great strides on the topic of controller support, building on the learnings of Anno 1800’s console version. Providing the best experience for each platform without negatively impacting another remains one of our key principles.

Let’s take a look at some islands!

We have just mentioned that we made significant progress on the islands in the past months. So, as a little (early) Christmas present, we’re excited to give you a first small look at the world of Anno 117: Pax Romana with some early screenshots of the two provinces: Latium and Albion!

Keep in mind these screenshots have been taken from a work-in-progress version of the game and do not reflect the final quality of the game.

This is the province of Latium, close to the heart of the Empire: wide open areas, sandy beaches, lavender fields and cliffs to stand on and watch the sunset from.

“We took strong inspirations from the beautiful Amalfi coast and the bay of Naples. Our goal was to create the typical warm and welcoming Anno feeling. A place that delivers on the fantasy of a game set in this era. It’s sunny, you feel a mild breeze – it’s a place where even the rich Romans in ancient times liked to spend their vacations.” – Manuel Reinher, Creative Director

The province of Albion, much further in the north, has its own visual design: rocky landscapes with high cliffs and mountains, marshy areas, fog and rain – a significant change in scenery.

“We wanted to create a striking contrast between the provinces and the mystic Celtic Albion is perfect for that. It’s the most alien place within the Empire. It’s wet, misty, full of marshland – a place far from home where no civilized Roman wants to be. You will face new challenges in this province, but also new exciting opportunities that these wetlands and the local people unlock in your adventure as a governor.” – Manuel Reinher, Creative Director.

These are the lands our dear Towncrier wandered through back in June in our reveal trailer (Build it!), as you might remember. We’re sure he would also really, really enjoy wandering through these lands in-game…

Anno 117: Pax Romana on Steam

In further news: We’re pleased to confirm that Anno 117: Pax Romana will be available on Steam from Day 1 when it releases in 2025 together with all other platforms: Ubisoft Connect, the Epic Store, Xbox Series and PlayStation.

Wishlist Anno 117: Pax Romana on Steam now by following this link: Steam Wishlist.

We can’t wait for you to get your hands on the game next year on the platform of your choice!

A look into the future

For the next months we have plenty on our hands, including – of course – the feedback points from the latest playtest, all the while planning our communication for 2025.

There’s work to be done on the character portraits and the quests, but also on the music side of things: it wouldn’t be an Anno game without a fantastic soundtrack!

As mentioned above already, we’re also busy working on the UI elements for the many menus that help you with your tasks , as well as the general user experience, the look and feel for Anno 117: Pax Romana.

And there’s the topic of incidents: it wouldn’t be an Anno game without the occasional fire, for example. How often and in which way these appear and how players can act against them, however, are topics the team is still exploring further.

This topic of course also plays into the general topic of “difficulty”, which we touched on above when we talked about the recent playtest.

We will continue to give you the occasional more general development updates like this in the future and – next year – will be able to show you gameplay and impressions of these topics as well.

Until next time!

How are we creating the vision for a new Anno game? Which challenges do we need to face when working on the concept of a new game? Let’s dive into the topic of designing an Anno game together with our Game Director Jan Dungel!

For this blog, we’ll first go a bit back in time to the beginnings of Anno 117: Pax Romana. Then we talk about the roles of Game Director and Creative Director in our team and about our overall approach to Game Design.

This is the first of two blogs on this subject: the second blog will go a bit more into the day-to-day work of the Game Design team on Anno 117.

First Steps

So, a little while ago, Anno 1800’s postlaunch was still ongoing and we started working on the console version, a small group of the team here in Mainz started brainstorming on the next project. Clearly, we wanted (and needed) a new project to follow after Anno 1800 – but what kind of project? In those discussions, several key points needed to be decided upon.

For example: What type of game do we want to create? – Well, that one was answered rather quickly: after the massive success of Anno 1800, of course we wanted to build on that with a new Anno title.

Part of this decision obviously had to be: What then should the setting for the next Anno game be? Now you know: it’s inspired by Ancient Rome!

Tied deeply into these discussions also was: What are our strategic goals for the new Anno game? For example, for Anno 1800 one huge goal was to go back to the roots – with the game being an answer to the feedback to Anno 2205.

Additionally, we checked if and how we achieved our goals for our last game(s) and evaluate past strategies and successes.

Questions like these set the baseline for all future discussions, therefore, let’s elaborate on the last two points a bit more.

Agreeing on strategic goals

One goal for Anno 117: Pax Romana, for example, is to provide once again a strong Anno for our fans and hardcore players after the massive success of Anno 1800; BUT we also have several points we want to improve on – a key being the experience for new players. That means tackling the topic of onboarding, for example. We are quite aware that saying things like this occasionally results in some worried faced within our core audience – but we consider it achievable, albeit challenging.

Game Designs job then ultimately is finding ways to achieve the goals we set ourselves for the new game.

Agreeing on the setting

Indeed, the setting for any Anno is one of the earliest things we decide on. That’s cause the setting itself can already answer strategic questions.

If we, for example, wanted to grow our Scandinavian audience (to use a VERY random example), maybe Vikings or the time of the Great Northern War would be well-suited.

It also immediately determines the narrative approach, as well as feature set. Anno 1800 could distinguish between sailing and steam ships, Anno 2070 could add aircrafts – and both examples impact logistics, warfare and more in these games and therefore have large impacts on many layers of the overall design.

And – as you know, we decided to set Anno 117: Pax Romana in an Ancient Roman setting. There were several reasons (and therefore also answers to strategic questions) for this, starting with the fact that (as we also know from previous surveys) Rome simply is a fan-favourite setting – something we know would go very well with our existing audience.

Rome, as a setting, also simply is an obvious choice for a builder game like Anno. Rome stands for a big empire, many different cultures, a network of trade (with plenty of trade by ship), centralised but also spread across many provinces (not unimportant when thinking about postlaunch opportunities) and the Romans themselves as builders – from towns to infrastructure to large public buildings.

The setting, also, has mass-appeal, and people know Rome and the Romans (to the point where parts of this knowledge might be considered stereotypes). That – to an extend – also provides a certain risk: we needed our own take, the Anno take, to the setting we have chosen.

There are so many aspects that appear in people’s minds when thinking about “the Romans”. The typical imperial legionnaires, political intrigue and Caesar’s murder, gladiators and all the ruins still visible today.

Self-identification

Another obvious question we had to ask ourselves, was: What type of game is Anno? And what makes Anno, Anno, from a Game Design perspective?

The first question is not that easy to answer, actually. And we see that often when following discussions between our fans as well.

Anno is a premiere builder game within the strategy genre – you’re doing far more than just building cities, though!

No, Anno goes beyond that and includes city building, deep economy simulation, 4X strategy elements and an immersive world with a narrative layer to hold it together and dive deeper into the setting. These systems interact with each other to a degree that Jan suggests Anno turns almost into a puzzle game.

It’s a unique mix and this is our specialization in the genre: we are Anno. And we call ourselves a builder game since these puzzle pieces, this complexity, is due to all the things players build in our games: cities, relationships, trading networks, fleets and strategies.

In fact, self-identification is key (we have talked about the approach by our Brand team previously), and we’re looking in detail at the evolution of our own games: Which new mechanics were introduced in past games? Which new features? Which features were tried and then never returned? Which features did we love and which ones did we not like?

That also includes putting ourselves into the place of the player, and asking the question: What are my expectations to an Anno game from this perspective? What are my needs and wishes when playing an Anno game? What excites me? What bores me? Accordingly, playing our own games, including older titles, also plays an important role for our Game Design team (and the onboarding of new Designers) in understanding what makes Anno, Anno.

In short: we need to become Anno players and remove ourselves from seat the of the developer for a bit. After all, ultimately, we’re (also) building the game for ourselves.

Let’s use one prominent example for this “Anno DNA” topic: Islands!

Islands are another unique selling point of Anno, a key ingredient since the very first game – and, phew, a much-discussed subject within our community as well. For us, islands – or at least the principle of islands: space limited areas with a logistics area between them – are core to the Anno experience. They would not need to be literal islands, but the limitation of space (through island size, number and design) and the challenges (see: puzzle!) that arise based on that are key – they create a purpose for the player and influence many other aspects of the game’s design.

Additionally, islands naturally communicate space: there’s no doubt where players can build and where they can’t. The separation between building area and logistics area is clear and doesn’t require and UI help or artificial map borders.

As many of you also pointed out in the past: islands are also a key aspect that makes us historically inspired but not historically accurate. Our real world does consist of many larger land masses, which are not present in an Anno game.

From Anno 1602 over Anno 1404 to Anno 1800 – the world is always made up of a multitude of islands with unique designs and terrain features. Easily visible by a quick glance at the minimap.

Finally, it’s important to note that we’re not working in a bubble: we’re performing quite a bit of research into what other games are doing. What are current industry standards for strategy games? (for UI/UX design, game design, narrative design etc.) And then there are of course playtests with members of our community – we’ll tackle that topic in a future blog.

Creative Directors and Game Directors – what’s the difference?

This is maybe a good time to stop for a second and ask: What does a Game Director do? And a Creative Director?

For us, both jobs’ responsibilities naturally overlap in many areas, since both are shaping the creative vision of the game.

Our Game Director Jan’s main task is translating the creative vision for Anno 117: Pax Romana into how the game is supposed to be. That includes narrative layers, Level Art (e.g. available building space) and Art (e.g. size of buildings) but also long-term plans (postlaunch) and all its implications.

He is directing the game and the team, with an emphasis on making sure the game is fun and that people are aligned on the vision and are not working in silos. For example, building size and island size need to work together for proper balancing, so, Game Design, Level Art and Art are in regular communication.

His tasks can go from high-level topics to low-level details like balancing.

The split in responsibilities is expressed in so far as that Jan is basically purely focused on the Anno team itself and on building the game.

Our Creative Director Manuel’s main mission is to come up with a strong creative vision for the project, communicate this vision to the team and stakeholders and to make sure that we stay on course over time. He is aligning, inspiring and challenging the team, mainly by providing direction on high-level topics. Off course he does this not alone, he is working closely with all disciplines of the Anno leadership team, most of the time with other Directors like Jan, to make sure that we achieve our goals and deliver a game that our fans and potential new audiences will love.

A big part of his work is also to represent the game and team outside of our studio. This can be within Ubisoft, or as a spokesman to our fans and press.  He is also working closely with Haye (Brand Director) and her team to make sure that the way we present Anno 117: Pax Romana is in line with the creative vision of the game.

It’s important to note that – as with many other aspects that we talk about in our blogs with game development insights – job descriptions are specific to Anno. Other projects and other developers might give roles with the same names different tasks and responsibilities.

Same goes for our approach to conceptualising a new game, the way our Production team (topic of a future DevBlog) works etc. Each project and team has different needs and priorities, there rarely is a “one-size-fits-all” solution to game development that can be just used for everything.

Outro

What followed these initial questions were weeks of research into the setting and potential features. Our Senior Writer Matt started outlining the world and exploring story angles, while all of them together also had to answer questions like:

• Is the setting done too often already?
• What will put us apart from other games?
• And: Do we like it and actually want to work on it?

On the topic of features, we did some first decisions on which “old” features to keep, which to change and which are mandatory – for example, because of the setting chosen.

However: now we’re already entering the development territory and leaving the original “creating a vision” space. Therefore, we’ll cover this in a future DevBlog.

To briefly summarize: We’re always starting with asking some very fundamental questions (Type of game? Goals? Setting?) while identifying and reaffirming the series’ DNA and main pillars. Only after that we start exploring narrative and feature questions to create the basis for the game and slowly onboard the rest of the team. This is when the team starts creating high concepts and later detailed design documents.

Stay tuned for our follow-up blog when we talk about the day-to-day work of the Game Design team and how we document features and mechanics.